#soylent | Logs for 2026-10-15

« return
[01:01:10] -!- Loggie [Loggie!Loggie@Soylent/BotArmy] has joined #soylent
[13:22:31] <Ingar> https://soylentnews.org
[13:22:32] <systemd> ^ 0303Intel Optimizes IPv6 Networking Into Nothingness, Say Users
[13:22:39] <Ingar> is soylent mocking me? :D
[14:50:44] -!- DiarrhoeaChaChaCha has quit [Quit: Client closed]
[16:30:19] -!- DiarrhoeaChaChaCha [DiarrhoeaChaChaCha!~Diarrhoea@109.136.xql.pqt] has joined #soylent
[16:47:25] -!- Runaway1956 [Runaway1956!~guy@the.abyss.stares.back] has joined #soylent
[16:48:04] <Runaway1956> I just noticed someone is abusing the spam mod: https://soylentnews.org
[16:48:05] <systemd> ^ 0303SoylentNews Comments | Hundreds Of French Supermarkets Hacked In 'Unprecedented' Cyberattack ( https://soylentnews.org )
[17:06:44] -!- fab23 has quit [Quit: macOS is user friendly. It is just picky about who his friends are.]
[17:11:55] -!- fab23 [fab23!~fabian@ysxbxfyv.wenks.ch] has joined #soylent
[20:00:13] <AlwaysNever> From the article on IPv6: "IPv4 was completely stable." - No shit, Sherlock.
[20:05:00] <AlwaysNever> IPv6 user look like guinea pigs to me...
[20:10:58] <chromas> Should have just released 4.2, adding a few extra bytes to the address and call lit a day.
[20:19:56] <AlwaysNever> IPv6 was designed for ful, universal, un-NATted P2P networking. That ain't going to fly in an IoT world
[20:20:49] <AlwaysNever> and if NAT is going to stay, we may as well kepp IPv4