#dev | Logs for 2016-06-12

« return
[12:34:07] chromas is now known as EF
[12:34:22] EF is now known as jewmas
[12:44:59] jewmas is now known as chromas
[15:00:28] -!- Bender has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[15:10:15] -!- Bender [Bender!Bender@Soylent/BotArmy] has joined #dev
[15:24:48] -!- Bender has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[15:25:08] -!- Bender [Bender!Bender@Soylent/BotArmy] has joined #dev
[15:47:30] -!- New-York-City [New-York-City!~LaTahzeN@85.106.oms.nnw] has joined #dev
[15:47:31] <New-York-City> 14Ya Yamur, Ya ki UsLansn Gurur..
[15:52:14] New-York-City is now known as Turkey
[15:52:27] Turkey is now known as Ottoman
[16:56:47] -!- Ottoman has quit []
[23:14:33] <Bytram> re: taking forever for takyon to load his user info page
[23:14:35] <Bytram> appears to be located in template: userInfo;users;default
[23:16:01] <Bytram> line 133: PROCESS listSubmissions title=title admin_flag=admin_flag submissions=submissions;
[23:16:50] <Bytram> appears to be located in template: listSubmissions;users;default
[23:20:09] -!- takyon_ [takyon_!~422c73bf@Soylent/Staff/Editor/takyon] has joined #dev
[23:21:19] <Bytram> re: taking forever for takyon to load his user info page
[23:21:25] <Bytram> appears to be located in template: userInfo;users;default
[23:21:27] <Bytram> line 133: PROCESS listSubmissions title=title admin_flag=admin_flag submissions=submissions;
[23:21:41] <Bytram> appears to be located in template: listSubmissions;users;default
[23:22:03] <Bytram> *that* template accepts a structure containing all the submissions and iterates through all of them
[23:22:36] <Bytram> there's a variable, secs_back = -86400 * 2;
[23:23:16] <Bytram> is used to calc: cutoff_time
[23:24:21] <Bytram> that looks to be 2 days ago... but I do not see that var used!??
[23:24:50] <takyon_> that's a nice cutoff time
[23:25:09] <Bytram> terribly short, IMNSHO
[23:25:28] <Bytram> if used, it would only show submissions inthe past 48 hours
[23:26:37] <takyon_> oh
[23:26:39] <Bytram> note, the listSubmissions template seems to be designed to work with IPID, too
[23:26:53] <takyon_> I thought it was the cutoff time for how long the query could run :D
[23:26:55] <Bytram> at least hte comments sugested that
[23:27:22] <Bytram> still, they compute the value, but do not seem to use it... so it's a moot point
[23:30:36] * Bytram is trying to find out where submissions is getting populated
[23:30:56] <Bytram> it just seems to *appear* in userInfo;users;default
[23:34:17] <Bytram> for user *comments*, there's a var: comment_time = number of days back we are limiting the comments shown to. If 0 or undefined we're showing comments sequentially w/o time limits
[23:34:44] <Bytram> suppose we could/should do something similar with submissions
[23:36:27] <takyon_> actually
[23:36:37] <takyon_> if we're talking about the submissions displayed on the user page
[23:36:43] <takyon_> I think only the last year's worth are shown
[23:37:40] <takyon_> I made some submissions as early as April 2015, possibly December 2014 which aren't shown
[23:37:51] <Bytram> nod nod
[23:38:01] <Bytram> I just loaded up my user info page for comparison
[23:38:12] <Bytram> am looking at it as an AC and as me
[23:38:24] <Bytram> as martyb, I see: martyb's Latest 33 of 517 Comments
[23:38:46] <Bytram> as an AC, I see: martyb's Latest 24 of 517 Comments
[23:39:06] <takyon_> hmm
[23:40:33] <Bytram> also, *potential* problem of same issue with Journal entries... have not explored what happens if someone is very prolific, but could be subject to same issue.
[23:42:50] <takyon_> i'm far from breaking the system with journal entries AFAIK
[23:43:00] <takyon_> I'm like #3 but far behind the first two
[23:43:11] <Bytram> so, it *seems* that there is a *fixed* limit on *number* of comments displayed as opposed to a time-based limit??
[23:43:26] <takyon_> 100, right?
[23:43:34] <Bytram> we can't be the best in *everything* =)
[23:43:58] <takyon_> "best"
[23:44:05] <takyon_> best journal spammer
[23:44:06] <Bytram> I'd like to have more data than just two data points.
[23:44:12] <Bytram> zactly!
[23:44:51] <Bytram> I guess I should take a look at p666
[23:44:54] <Bytram> brb
[23:46:32] <Bytram> Phoenix666's Latest 24 of 2848 Comments
[23:46:40] <Bytram> as ac: Phoenix666's Latest 24 of 2848 Comments
[23:47:29] <takyon_> is it a time based cutoff combined with 100 ceiling???
[23:47:37] <Bytram> idk
[23:47:46] <Bytram> taht's why I'm trying to get more data
[23:48:02] <Bytram> as martyb: Phoenix666's Latest 100 of 2848 Comments
[23:48:10] <takyon_> oh
[23:48:41] <takyon_> im wondering why it was 33 for yours
[23:48:48] <Bytram> I'd like to counter those data from recent users with some from somebody who used to be active but has no recent activity, to check out possible time-based limitations
[23:48:57] * Bytram checks his 'zoo'
[23:49:48] <Bytram> have you seen 'Dopefish' around lately?
[23:52:06] <Bytram> as AC: Dopefish's Latest 24 of 28 Comments
[23:52:22] <takyon_> no
[23:52:22] <Bytram> last comment was on: *Wednesday October 22 2014, @08:11PM
[23:52:27] <takyon_> y
[23:52:46] <Bytram> so, it seems to me that, for an AC, it is strictly count-limited
[23:53:22] <Bytram> ans, as martyb, I also see: Dopefish's Latest 24 of 28 Comments
[23:54:05] <Bytram> wait, only 24 as me?
[23:54:26] <Bytram> takyon: what do YOU see: https://soylentnews.org
[23:54:26] <aqu4> Failed to connect to retrieve page title.
[23:55:40] <Bytram> takyon_: ^^^ (had wrong nick for you. :/)
[23:55:49] <Bytram> break time; back shortly
[23:56:37] <takyon_> 24 of 28