#meeting-discuss | Logs for 2023-09-22
« return
[13:59:08] -!- requerdanos has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[15:43:06] -!- halibut has quit [Quit: Timeout]
[15:48:33] -!- halibut [halibut!~halibut@CanHazVHOST/halibut] has joined #meeting-discuss
[16:36:34] -!- requerdanos [requerdanos!~requerdan@Soylent/Staff/Editor/requerdanos] has joined #meeting-discuss
[19:02:51] * janrinok checking in
[19:48:13] -!- notkolie has quit [Read error: -0x1: ERROR - Generic error]
[19:48:34] -!- notkolie [notkolie!~notkolie@47.180.mlm.kw] has joined #meeting-discuss
[20:25:09] -!- aristarchus [aristarchus!~aristarch@195.146.h.wg] has joined #meeting-discuss
[20:28:42] <aristarchus> Peanut gallery awaits with baited breathing.
[20:29:53] <mechanicjay> mmm peanut breath
[20:35:08] <aristarchus> Quorum?
[20:44:32] <aristarchus> Wow, they did something! Not sure if approving minutes is all that earth-shaking, though.
[20:51:03] <aristarchus> Voting? With no motion on the floor? Curious.
[20:51:10] -!- notkolie has quit [Changing host]
[20:51:10] -!- notkolie [notkolie!~notkolie@Soylent/Staff/Management/kolie] has joined #meeting-discuss
[20:51:10] -!- mode/#meeting-discuss [+o notkolie] by ChanServ
[20:52:36] <notkolie> Objections to reports are unusual procedure.
[20:52:58] <notkolie> But its a tool so as long as it moves roberts rules can claw its way out of its grave.
[21:02:25] <aristarchus> Forgetting to exclude me from "community" in the very bylaws?
[21:03:23] <notkolie> No.
[21:03:32] <notkolie> It wont mention you.
[21:06:38] <aristarchus> And jan is a bot bigot!
[21:10:04] <aristarchus> Will the committee be making public the name of counsel, once retained?
[21:21:02] <aristarchus> For purposes of posterity, what is an "MA"?
[21:22:17] <notkolie> Matt Angel.
[21:22:36] <notkolie> The PBC's finances are public and always have been.
[21:26:25] <aristarchus> Except for nebulous payments like for "professional services? And financial statements are years out of date.
[21:27:44] <Fnord666> The interesting thing will be that to be on the board of a company the member will have to verify their true identity.
[21:30:01] <notkolie> Ok so the board doesn't have to the the governing council.
[21:30:07] <notkolie> be*
[21:30:23] <notkolie> It just has to be willing to fulfill legal requirements of the legal position.
[21:30:38] <notkolie> The voting party itself can be seperate bylaw defined group.
[21:40:23] <aristarchus> Once again, ACs are not community members?
[21:40:56] <notkolie> I'd support it if we could define how an AC could vote and be counted properly.
[21:41:35] <requerdanos> it's simple, the AC could register an account and build good karma like everyone else, right?
[21:43:00] <aristarchus> Right.
[22:01:11] -!- aristarchus has quit [Quit: Client closed]